WWW: This is solid and you clearly show understanding of the terminology and key issues.
EBI:Q3 and Q4 are really lacking the depth and detail for the higher levels. You don't have much more than two sentences in some paragraphs. What about the other side of the argument?
Q1: 1
Q2: 1
Q3: 4
Q4: 9
3) Did you get any media terminology wrong in the assessment? Make a note of it here for future revision:
I dd not get any media terminology wrong.
4) Look specifically at question 3 - did you successfully write about both the preferred and oppositional readings? Did your answers match any in the mark scheme? I need to add more depth and detail in my oppositional readings.
I wrote about both the preferred and oppositional readings however did not in write enough of detail. Also most of my answers matched the mark sceme for example I talked about sexism and how the poster portrays women. I do believe I need to add more depth to more oppositional readings. I could add how women may be insulted by the lack of femininity.
No comments:
Post a Comment